So at Krymson we have gotten ourselves into a rather sticky predicament. We have a client that's starting a magazine for a particular niche. What he wants is for his users to be able to come in and add their own content to these little magazines. Every magazine would have the same format...
Google has no idea what you're CSS is doing. As Chris said. Google looks at your html and makes sure the content is clean. This shouldn't change between mobile and desktop designs.
Don't do this! I didn't even know frontpage still existed but avoid it at all costs. Wordpress is really good for things like this but it sounds like you already have a site set up and just want to add this functionality. If this is the case you'll probably have to look into some smaller CMS you...
put display:block; on your images and it fixes your problem. Then if you want to keep that grid you float them left.
That white space is because their default display for images is display: inline; and display inline reads the white space in html and turns it into one non breaking space.
I've seen something similar that had stars in the background that kind of flashed as you scroll down. A slow fade in and out in different positions. Really neat
Yeah... like benjamin said it comes down to how you built the site. If it's used in php then you could just add it to the included section but if it's not already built that way you're going to have to edit every single page anyway...
Ummm yes and no. There's no reason to use the sliced buttons for that navigation. A simple navigation menu with minimal css would do that much better. When you use images it's inflexible and it takes longer to load. Honestly your best bet is going to be using that psd only as something to look...
Oh I see... I feel justified saying that because a site that poorly coded is better off getting scrapped and starting over. Drastic, yes, but I believe it. If I was given that site and asked to fix this or that I would scrap it...
I'm not kidding... I'm trying to help. You really trying to say his code is semantic and readable? Because it's not... it's convoluted and messy! The list looks like it's nested inside the header and then positioned absolutely outside of it or something like that....
Your best bet is going to be to scrap that and start over... and this time... don't use tables...
Heck I can't even find where your header is because your code is so convoluted.
I love it Ronald! I've been wanting to use parrallex (I assume that's what you did? Didn't look) I just haven't found the time to play with it yet. Looks great.