Search results

they worked for me. it could be a cache problem with your browser.

Google reader? I'm so out of touch, lol.

Those are good reasons to always have a contract. It works both ways, too... sometimes you do the work and don't get paid and the client disappears. Oh, and if you're good, and I mean really good, don't sell yourself cheap. There are only so many clients one person can handle and you could work...

That's one of the things I didn't like about it... it can be done but it sure is a pain.

I used to swear by oscommerce but lately have been converted to zen cart. It's really just a scaled down version of oscommerce but so easy to configure and just as powerful. The clients seem to like it very much. It will do what you need. http://www.zen-cart.com/modules/frontpage/

I didn't think the girl was a problem, however I don't like the blue with the brown. Like ian, I'm not a fan of the way the page is split but if it were a more equitable split it might be workable... the way it is right now, it's off center.

in your source code it looks like you have competing sizes. Here you have it set to 100%: <p class="mainframe"><img src="Images/JPG/design1.jpg" alt="" name="header" width="100%" id="header" /></p> But the next two lines down in your code, you have absolute sizes and all of these are...

You'd be surprised how many webmasters I know who make quite good livings using Frontpage. rhardy, from what I can see, you have two choices. Either a frame or a layer. Frames are easier to set up but are not very search engine friendly since they are basically a page within a page. Layers...

The images are either fuzzy or blurry... sometimes both.

You can take a screenshot of them if they aren't laid out in a graphics program. If they are laid out in a graphics program you can save the whole page by choosing "Save As..."

That's a neat concept, CharlieW. I hope it works well for you.

divs are what you used in the html code to layout your web page. They are invisible in the browser so to speak. You have look at the coding behind the pictures and layout you see in the browser to see the tags labeled <div> </div> That is how your site is set up, using divs.

Actually, it's not that bad... really it isn't. It isn't my type of site so I'm probably not the best judge either. The biggest issue I see is the placement of your divs... You have huge gaps between them. If you tighten those up you might put the whole page into a better perspective from...

The html editor you use is irrelevant to the task. It's a java script that does that trick. I like http://www.javascriptsource.com myself. Others may have some favorite sites as well.

What do you need to know?

It's not so bad with the text changes you've made. Don't always defer to us. If you like it, that's what really counts most... or rather if your clients do, lol. We can advise but it's still up to the webmaster for the final decision. I have sites that clients love but I don't care so much for...

I agree with ian about the text. Also I don't think grayscale is the best tonal range for the image. Perhaps a light sepia instead? I would have commented before but I thought Arkette had it well in hand, :-). When he/she was talking about the tonal quality there were sharp contrasts that...

Would you be changing the order once you have it linked to next?

If I'm understanding you right... the only way I know to do that would be using a time delay to load the comic strips but to do that you are assuming you know at what speed the viewer is going to be reading. It might seem like a bit of a hassle for them to click to get to the next one but it's...

without being able to see the source code i would hazard a guess that it was done through a css file with image slices to make the whole and you copied only the "flat" part of the image.