redesign

Dorky

New Member
zack i won't go over the verbatim of your readout but i don't zip site components for one, secondly if you want to suggest less requests, you should point out the accurate amount of request made by my work(like images). but i suppose you only use one image per site? and how many of those requests are made by the social tools on my site. maybe you should email fb and tell them they shouldn't make http requests for their tools, or are you saying social tools are bad design. it's a microsite, not a "box" site, not sure where you even got that... i will assume dreamweaver. and that you want to make suggestions is great, but only after i called you out about not doing it. but no worries. i had linux buddies just like you in the 90s. my site and work on other forums shows what i see them for and my post in other forums and some older posts on here reflect just that. i don't need to read your posts to know this is your typical behavior. also if loading screens are bad, phone adobe and tell them you would rather watch the components load and they are doing it wrong. it's not that you have no facts to present, but that you intentionally misrepresented them for sake of showing your a$$. but i am just as guilty. i made this post because i didn't feel the mods wer doing enough to filter spam postings, i guess thats what i get. but zack, i know your kind and i will share with you something. people that know, don't have to run around trying to prove it.
 
Last edited:

Dorky

New Member
@Phreaddee

i was talking to zack. all you did was jump on the bandwagon. no original material, good or bad. i have/had no reason to respond.
 

Dorky

New Member
Compressing the following resources with gzip could reduce their transfer size by about two thirds (~4.23KB):
/?page=home could save ~4.23KB
yet your readout gives me a C grade on zip compression. explain the dif to our viewers zack.
 

zach

Member
Dorky, at this point, I don't have the will power to decipher what the hell your talking about; half of your post doesn't make any sense.

It would be better if you could properly form a sentence by learning to break up your thoughts.

I think you should get over it, move on and find someone else to argue with.
 
Last edited:

springmedia

New Member
It does have a very antique feel to the overall design, just something to be aware of is that the font you’re using becomes pixelated on high rez monitors. It gives you that sharp look rather than smooth. How are you planning to segregate the body? Would be nice to see the design with some content, keep it up.
 

Phreaddee

Super Moderator
Staff member
new design looks better than the old one but still a few problems.

devepoment???

the rollover colour on your nav menu is almost the same as the red background, and it's background image (the arrow) simply takes too long to load.

your footer sits too high and there is a disjointed chunk of the left column sitting below it...
 

leroy30

New Member
www.grammarly.com is a good resource for spelling and grammer.

I think the site is a bit basic for a 'web design and development' website.. needs to be a bit more proffesional and have a bit more design flare in my opinion.

Just my 2c
 

Dorky

New Member
www.grammarly.com is a good resource for spelling and grammer.

I think the site is a bit basic for a 'web design and development' website.. needs to be a bit more proffesional and have a bit more design flare in my opinion.

Just my 2c

nice of you to repost the spelling bit. i'm not sure gary calling it was enough. by the by, you have some text dropping off. also i don't take advice from CMS designers. also, if clutter and glitz is it, better email google and tell them they got it wrong. i think what you mean is my site should look like every other site cranked out of dreamweaver. i disagree. what the web truly lacks including your site is originality.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot.jpg
    Screenshot.jpg
    21.7 KB · Views: 20
Last edited:

Dorky

New Member
@Phreaddee
thx man. can you post a screen shot and browser type.
re: link bg, i will add a js pre-fetch later.

@gary
thx for the spell catch man.
 
Last edited:
Top