Search results

Can you not use server-side includes?

You just right click the image and click "resize"

You don't even need actions. The batch commands in PS can do it. Hell, if you're on Windows, just install this bad boy: http://sourceforge.net/projects/phototoysclone/

I think OP is wanting it to not only be resized, but a page automatically generated with links to the images. I can't think of much myself, but maybe MS Expression Web carried on the crap-tastic torch?

It comes before.

http://www.thesitewizard.com/apache/prevent-directory-listing-htaccess.shtml

Turn it on in your user settings under subscription mode.

Try adding this to the end of your CSS file: .lb-close{ background-position: top right; display:inline-block; height:100%; width:100%; }

I generally write all of the HTML I can reasonably foresee writing, and then start styling it, grouping the different areas of the page, i.e., general styles, header, nav, main, sidebar, footer... I almost never use IDs as selectors, and try to get away without classes as much as possible...

Thanks for coming back to post your fixes. Most don't.

Lol. That's pretty good.

Why exactly do you need the images? I ask for 2 reasons: 1. You can likely do it without them still. 2. If you can't, knowing why will go a long way in answering your question.

A link? No. It's not a copy/paste solution. You do what the situation calls for. Leave out what you don't need on mobile, AJAX the rest in for desktop.

It's off-screen on purpose.

It's fun...perhaps a bit too fun to be professional. Not saying I don't like it, though. Not very easy to get around on mobile.

Easily fixed with less than 10 lines of JS. Responsive doesn't have to be bloated if you plan ahead.

It's actually a pretty solid design. It does, however look a bit canned. Almost like a downloadable general purpose template. Part of that may be the fact that the color pallet is overly common among "corporate"-style websites. I like that most of the other pages have the contact form right in...

Ya, IDK. I was having the same problem as OP with 72 ppi, and when I switched to 96, it went away. Also had the same issues with my wife's photography when I posted it online.

Not true.